So it would help me, if somebody who is using programs that are already there starts threads with questions about them in Statalist. I don't know how comfortable are the readers with every such advertisement. Īs I wrote, both programs were advertized in the Statalist and a similar SPSS forum. Tags like "import, export, transfer, spss, file format" generally attract my attention. Another problem is that most posters do not apply appropriate tags to their posts, and responders can't do that. In some cases I need to get back to the office, in other I need to check that something works before getting it posted, etc, etc. I do check the forum regularly, but it is not always that I can reply immediately. Will you be adding it to SSC soon? Given that it is labeled as beta, are there issues to be concerned about?Dear Richard, findit savespss- and -findit spss- do not find your program, as it is only available from your site and your site is not searched. I knew about usespss but not the other programs. Sergiy, you need to check the forums more often. Programs that are only mentioned in list messages are easy to overlook. Maybe you can even create a pseudo-entry for saveto9 that merely tells people how to get the program. Or, get your personal site included in the search results. It would also be nice to get what you can on SSC - if still beta then maybe just shout out some warnings - because it is a lot easier to find something on SSC. I put a list of suggested sites on my course pages, and I would add that page to the list if it existed. Sergiy, if it doesn't exist already, it would be nice to have a single web page that briefly described all your file conversion utilities and then provided links to them. I still love Stat/Transfer because it is relatively cheap and can quickly do whatever I want and very little learning curve is involved. We were nearly up to post 20 before his solutions were brought up. But, you have to find them, learn how to use them, etc. Sergiy's programs are great, especially if you are talking about tasks that only involve Stata and SPSS. ![]() If you are using data features that did not exist in earlier versions of Stata, then something has to give in the conversion process. Just take seriously Nick's caution about mangling the data. I have Stata 7 through 13 installed on my computer, so I think I am covered no matter what! There is a history of even some programmers misunderstanding this, as a diligent search of the archives will uncover. ![]() But some other user-written programs are just wrappers for saveold and don't extend its functionality in any fundamental sense. Sergiy's programs are a marked exception, as they do things inbuilt Stata commands don't offer. ![]() Save data in memory to file in Stata 12 format I just checked the help for save ( if you don't have Stata 13) and the purpose of saveold is explained as What are people asking for? That Stata 1 can read your data? That if somebody somewhere is still using Stata ? then that obliges StataCorp to make available saving datasets so that they can read them? Among other details, StataCorp must be coy of introducing functionality which will be misreported as Stata mangling your data when it saves to older versions. People need to consider that being able to save to (much) older versions implies mangling your data increasingly as exporting increasingly older versions implies limits on variable types, number of observations, length of labels, representation of missing values, etc., etc. That aside - although it's the key issue for many - the requests of what StataCorp should do are strikingly asymmetric. For example, some people don't believe that I can't read recent Excel files on a machine I often use but I have no interest in spending money to make that possible. Naturally, the StataCorp view is that those other people are potential customers. Ironically, the more that loyal users upgrade, the more difficulties those loyal users then have in collaborating with people using other software or much older versions of Stata. ![]() But StataCorp want to encourage people to upgrade, which means sales. It's for them to consider what functionality might be added. StataCorp as we all should know are in business selling Stata and that affects what they do. Several quite different issues are mixed up in this thread and already we have seen that some experienced users are confused (even misinformed!).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |